Tag Archives: apple

Film fuels debate over 1996 air crash

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • TWA family member cites “Internet conspiracies”
  • Producer: “One or more ordnance explosions outside the aircraft caused the crash”
  • “TWA Flight 800″ will premiere July 17, the anniversary of the crash
  • NTSB investigator insists evidence showed an explosion inside the fuel tank

Editor’s note: Note language in story

(CNN) — A documentary on the 1996 explosion that brought down TWA Flight 800 offers “solid proof that there was an external detonation,” its co-producer said Wednesday.

“Of course, everyone knows about the eyewitness statements, but we also have corroborating information from the radar data, and the radar data shows a(n) asymmetric explosion coming out of that plane — something that didn’t happen in the official theory,” Tom Stalcup told CNN’s New Day.

All 230 people aboard TWA 800 died when the plane, headed for Paris, exploded and crashed into the Atlantic Ocean shortly after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York. Scores of witnesses observed a streak of light and a fireball, giving early rise to suspicions that the terrorists had struck the plane with a rocket.

Investigators concluded the streak was likely burning fuel streaming from the plane’s wing tank.

The National Transportation Safety Board ruled that the explosion was caused by an electrical short circuit, most likely originating in a fuel gauge line, which found its way into the center wing fuel tank, where it detonated fuel vapors and caused the B-747 to fall in pieces into the waters off Long Island.

A section of the wing of TWA Flight 800, which crashed July 17, 1996, floats in the Atlantic Ocean off Long Island, New York, on July 18, 1996. A new documentary A section of the wing of TWA Flight 800, which crashed July 17, 1996, floats in the Atlantic Ocean off Long Island, New York, on July 18, 1996. A new documentary “TWA Flight 800″ claims that the explosion that caused the crash was not an accident.

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

TWA Flight 800

HIDE CAPTION

<<

<

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

>

>>

Photos: TWA Flight 800Photos: TWA Flight 800

But some people have come forward, “all saying the same thing: that there was an external force — not from the center wing tank, there’s no evidence of that — but there is evidence of an external explosion that brought down that plane,” Stalcup said.

He cited “corroborating information from the radar data” and complained that “not one single eyewitness was allowed to testify — that’s unheard of.”

“The family members need to know what happened to their loved ones,” he said.

Asked why such information might have been suppressed, Stalcup said, “That’s a question that should be answered when this investigation gets reopened.”

Possibility of a review of new information

The NTSB acknowledged receipt Wednesday of the filmmakers’ petition — signed by former investigators — requesting that the investigation be reopened.

“As required by NTSB regulation, a petition for reconsideration of Board findings or a probable cause determination must be based on the discovery of new evidence or on a showing that the Board’s findings are erroneous,” said board spokeswoman Kelly Nantel.

What really happened

“We assign petition responses to the relevant modal office for drafting. The NTSB’s Office of Aviation Safety will assign staff, to the maximum extent practicable, who did not work on the original investigation to carefully prepare a response. The response will be presented to the full Board for their consideration and vote.”

The board’s investigation of TWA 800 lasted four years and “remains one of the NTSB’s most extensive investigations,” Nantel said.

Investigators “spent an enormous amount of time reviewing, documenting and analyzing facts and data and held a five-day public hearing to gather additional facts before determining the probable cause of the accident,” she said.

But she left open the possibility the case will be reopened.

“While the NTSB rarely re-investigates issues that have already been examined, our investigations are never closed, and we can review any new information not previously considered by board,” she said.

One TWA 800 family member reacted to the news of the documentary with skepticism.

“Some of the people involved in this group have been involved in Internet conspiracy theories for the last 15 years,” said Joe Lychner, whose wife, Pam, and two daughters, Shannon, 10, and Katie, 8, died in the incident.

“So far as I can tell, this is just a rehash of what’s been out on the Internet,” he said.

“If they have no new information and this is just trumped-up stuff that’s been out there forever, yes, it is hurtful,” Lychner said. “Why go through this again. Conversely, if they do have new information and it’s provable, it’s a game changer. I will watch this thing with a very critical eye, knowing what I know.”

John Goglia, a member of the five-person NTSB during the investigation, said he “took offense” at the filmmakers’ suggestion that board members ignored evidence. “I would never be part of any coverup — period,” he told CNN.

“This accident, this report, over 50,000 pages, if you take and just look at certain pieces of it, you can move the cause of this accident any way you want. You can take just the radar; you can say it was a missile. You have to take all of the pieces and look at them as a whole.

“The sequencing report that told how the airplane fell apart, none of it supports a missile — none of it. When you look at the physical evidence inside the tank, it’s clear that there was an explosion inside the tank. If the top of the tank goes up and the bottom of the tank goes down, and the forward side goes forward and the back of the tank goes back, that tells you that the blast was inside the tank — not outside.”

He said that no holes were found in the tank that would indicate something had penetrated it.

But the documentary asserts that a missile may have exploded adjacent to the plane.

Read: Can airlines be ranked for safety?

Critics challenge government investigation

Skeptics have long theorized that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by sinister forces.

They include Hank Hughes, who served as a senior accident investigator with the NTSB and helped reconstruct the aircraft. Others include Bob Young, a TWA investigator who participated in the investigation, and Jim Speer, an accident investigator for the Airline Pilots Association.

“These investigators were not allowed to speak to the public or refute any comments made by their superiors and/or NTSB and FBI officials about their work at the time of the official investigation,” a news release announcing the documentary said.

“They waited until after retirement to reveal how the official conclusion by the (NTSB) was falsified and lay out their case.”

James Kalstrom, who headed the FBI’s investigation into the explosion, dismissed suggestions that investigators concealed information and were not receptive to clues.

“If they felt that way back then, they could have come to me,” Kalstrom said. “I was someone desiring to get to the bottom of this, believe me. And I had a reputation for not, you know, for not pussyfooting around. Yet it seems like they’ve comfortably waited until they have their pensions before they became whistle-blowers. So I think it’s a bunch of bullcrap.”

The documentary, “TWA Flight 800,” will premiere July 17, the 17th anniversary of the crash.

Read: What caused engine to fail on one of world’s largest planes?

Stalcup is co-founder of the Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization and has been a longtime and passionate critic of the official investigation.

Suspicions that criminals or terrorists were behind the TWA 800 explosion are not new. The FBI conducted a parallel investigation, but concluded that the incident was not a crime or terrorist attack.

The NTSB said Tuesday that it was aware of the pending release of the documentary, which will air on EPIX TV network, and of the producers’ intent to file a petition to reopen the investigation.

The documentarians said they have a “trifecta of elements” that will “prove that the officially proposed fuel-air explosion did not cause the crash.” That trifecta includes forensic evidence, firsthand sources and corroborating witnesses, and the new statements from retired investigators.

The evidence proves that “one or more ordnance explosions outside the aircraft caused the crash,” the producers said. But it does not identify or speculate on the source of the ordnance explosions.

Read more about transportation with “On the Move”

View this article:  

Film fuels debate over 1996 air crash

‘Sopranos’ actor James Gandolfini dies, aged 51

James Gandolfini, who gained fame playing a memorable mafia boss on HBO's James Gandolfini, who gained fame playing a memorable mafia boss on HBO’s “The Sopranos,” died after suffering a possible heart attack in Italy on Wednesday, June 19. Pictured, Gandolfini at the premier of “Zero Dark Thirty” in 2012.

HIDE CAPTION

Photos: James Gandolfini

Photos: James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

Photos: James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

Photos: James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

Photos: James Gandolfini

Photos: James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

James Gandolfini

<<

<

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

>

>>

(CNN) — James Gandolfini, best known for his role as an anxiety-ridden mob boss on HBO’s “The Sopranos,” died Wednesday while on vacation in Italy. He was 51.

The exact cause of death is not known, but his managers said it was possibly a heart attack.

“It is with immense sorrow that we report our client, James Gandolfini. passed away today while on holiday in Rome, Italy,” managers Mark Armstrong and Nancy Sanders said in a joint statement. “Our hearts are shattered and we will miss him deeply. He and his family were part of our family for many years and we are all grieving.”

The actor had been scheduled to make an appearance at the Taormina Film Fest in Sicily this week.

Gandolfini won three Emmy Awards for his portrayal of Tony Soprano, the angst-wracked mob boss who visited a therapist and took Prozac while knocking off people. “The Sopranos” aired from 1999 to 2007.

Share your memories

“Jimmy was the spiritual core of our Sopranos family, and I am stunned at this devastating loss,” said Chris Albrecht, the former president of HBO who gave the green light to the show. “He was a great talent, but an even better man. My thoughts are with his family.”

Actor Steve Van Zandt, who played Tony Soprano’s confidant Silvio Dante, felt equally close to Gandolfini in real life. “I have lost a brother and a best friend,” he posted on Twitter. “The world has lost one of the greatest actors of all time.”

Gandolfini was born September 18, 1961, in Westwood, New Jersey, according to Biography.com.

He graduated from Rutgers University and, as the story goes, worked as a bartender and a bouncer in New York City until he went with a friend to an acting class.

He got his start on Broadway, with a role in the 1992 revival of “A Streetcar Named Desire” with Jessica Lange and Alec Baldwin.

Gandolfini’s big screen debut came in the role of a heavy in the bloody “True Romance” in 1993. His breakthrough on the small screen came in 1999 with the role of Tony Soprano.

“He was a genius. Anyone who saw him even in the smallest of his performances knows that,” David Chase, who developed “The Sopranos,” said in a statement. “…A great deal of that genius resided in those sad eyes.”

Gandolfini, who was notoriously press shy, had a reputation in the tabloids for being sometimes difficult.

“He wasn’t easy sometimes. But he was my partner, he was my brother in ways I can’t explain and never will be able to explain,” Chase said.

While Gandolfini was known for sometimes ruthless, often imposing characters, those who worked with him described an actor who put his heart into a role.

“He was just so good at the emotion. A very passionate man and a very, very tender man,” Matthew Warchus, who directed Gandolfini in the 2009 Broadway play “God of Carnage,” told CNN. “I really loved him and admired him a great deal.”

Larry King, who saw Gandolfini in Las Vegas just weeks ago, told CNN the actor was “jovial and seemed happy.”

“He stamped himself in ‘The Sopranos’ so much, people have overlooked his many diversified roles he’s performed,” King said. “He was a very diverse character actor, who became a star.”

Photos: People we lost in 2013

Photos: People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

Photos: People we lost in 2013

Photos: People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

People we lost in 2013

HIDE CAPTION

<<

<

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

>

>>

Photos: People we lost in 2013Photos: People we lost in 2013

Gandolfini’s acting credits included roles in “The Last Castle” with Robert Redford, “The Mexican” with Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts and “Surviving Christmas” with Ben Affleck.

In recent years, he had starred in several movies, including the Oscar-nominated “Zero Dark Thirty,” “The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3″ and “Killing Them Softly.”

Gandolfini was also known to children, voicing Carol, a wild thing, in the 2009 movie adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s classic “Where the Wild Things Are.”

He took to the stage to do a reading of Sendak’s “In The Night Kitchen” to mark the author’s 80th birthday.

News of the actor’s death spread quickly, drawing shock and sadness from those who had worked with him.

“James Gandolfini was a kind, funny, wonderful guy. I’m so lucky to have worked with him. Sending love to his family. Such a sad, sad day,” Olivia Wilde, who starred with the actor in “The Incredible Burt Wonderstone,” said in a post on Twitter.

Actor Steve Carell, who also appeared in the movie, simply said on Twitter: “James Gandolfini. What a great loss.”

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie described himself as a “huge fan” of Gandolfini.

“It’s an awful shock. James Gandolfini was a fine actor, a Rutgers alum and a true Jersey guy,” he said.

Gandolfini is survived by his wife, Deborah, and their 9-month-old daughter, Liliana. He is also survived by a son, Michael, from another marriage.

CNN’s KJ Matthews, Douglas Hyde, Elise Miller and Henry Hanks contributed to this report.

View article: 

‘Sopranos’ actor James Gandolfini dies, aged 51

Auch Spieletausch bleibt erlaubt – Microsoft nimmt Online-Zwang für Xbox zurück

Credit:  

Auch Spieletausch bleibt erlaubt – Microsoft nimmt Online-Zwang für Xbox zurück

‘Sopranos’ actor James Gandolfini dead


Actor James Gandolfini dead at age 51

By CNN Staff

June 20, 2013 — Updated 0003 GMT (0803 HKT)

The sound and the fury of Microsoft’s Xbox One backtrack

IMG 7959 520x245 The sound and the fury of Microsofts Xbox One backtrack

So, the massive public debate over Microsoft’s choices regarding Xbox One DRM, used games and a requisite Internet connection has come to roost. Today, the company pulled back from many of the stances that it had taken since the reveal began several weeks ago, and people are super-duper happy about it.

A large portion of the complaints were centered around the fact that the console would require you to connect to the Internet every 24 hours while on your home unit, and every hour while you were ‘guest’ playing on someone else’s.

The secondary issue was that of used games. The used game market is immense, with nearly zero of that going to the original game manufacturers or Microsoft themselves. But gamers love it because it allows many of them to take advantage of the fact that not everyone is willing to shell out $60 on a new game. Instead, they wait and pick those up at half the price a few weeks later.

The new system that Microsoft had proposed was going to put severe handicaps on that system. It would allow publishers to determine whether or not you could sell your game’s ‘license’ to someone else, and would restrict you from even giving the game away to another user unless it was a ‘friend’ that you had known more than 30 days.

Now, Microsoft has rescinded the Internet connection requirement and stated that the Xbox One will work pretty much exactly as it does with the Xbox 360 with regards to used games. Meaning that if you buy discs you’ll be able to sell them. Online games are still yours only, and cannot be shared or re-sold. And the disc must now be in the tray for you to play a game, regardless of whether you’ve installed it or not.

Everyone is crowing. Victory! Amazing! Microsoft buckles! And, to a degree, that’s correct. Microsoft absolutely had to do something to deflate this balloon of criticism or face a hard stumble against its major competitor, Sony. Especially since Sony had taken advantage of the situation and emphasized its (previously) much more lenient stance towards the Internet and used games.

Unfortunately, this victory is pyrrhic at best. Full of ‘sound and fury and signifying nothing‘, if you will. Yes, the policies have been reverted to their previous state, and gamers even got a nice bonus in that there are now no region restrictions on discs from various parts of the world.

But the Xbox One experience also got a significant amount worse for those people who don’t surf the used game market.

For instance, you can no longer now share or give away your online purchased (disc free) games. Under the previous rules you could play any of your online games anywhere and even give them away when you were done. There was even a (theoretical) provision for selling the license to those games. Even better, once you had proved that you had purchased any title from AAA to Live game, you could download and play it from any console using the Xbox cloud.

Think of it as iTunes in the Cloud for games. And if you’ve used Apple’s system for allowing you free access to your library of titles then you know it’s pretty much exactly how constant digital access to your library should work. It’s going to get even better in iOS 7 as Apple detailed during the keynote that all of your titles will show on all of your devices for streaming at any time, which is fantastic.

But now, that’s gone. You have to have a disc in your tray if you bought it offline. Removed along with the Internet connection check and whatever system they had in place to guarantee rights management. Also gone is the ability to share all of your Xbox One games with up to 10 family members, which was ridiculously cool.

If you’re balking over the cost of a game, why not split it with several family members and share the title? There’s a fairly large case here of not seeing the forest for the trees, and it’s costing gamers some very nice features as they follow the very loud herd.

The Internet connection requirement is a toughie. I get it. Some people like to take their consoles on vacation without Internet and checking in once a day would have been a pain. But it’s also a big part of the future of all devices, not just consoles. There’s simply very little room for a device that can’t find a way to connect to the Internet once in a while. In a couple of years it will be mind boggling for any device not to have a way to do so, and the Xbox One planned for that future.

Instead, gamers have an experience that, aside from cloud processing features that Microsoft says are sticking around, mirrors the same one they had in 2005. This is not 2005. These people who had a knee jerk reaction and ran around stomping their feet and yelling and waving their arms have literally talked themselves out of the gaming experience of the next 10 years and into one of the last 10.

I’m sure that the pressure Microsoft was under over the last few weeks was crushing. And a lot of it was their own fault. Mixed and unprepared messaging over these two major issues cost them the ability to pitch them as an integral part of the way gaming will be rather than the way it was. But I also think they’re responsible for not being able to stand up to publishers to set specific policies around used games rather than some nebulous ‘future plans’. Microsoft had the ability to act as the one to say no when the licensing deals for cloud gaming were (likely) rolled into the systems surrounding licensing and transfers.

So what we ended up with is a system that has stepped back down to the staid approach that Sony is taking with the Playstation 4. Gamers first, in the absolute sense. But gamers last, in the future sense. It’s a sad day, frankly.

Link:  

The sound and the fury of Microsoft’s Xbox One backtrack

Why Makerbot Is Like Apple

When we first discovered that Makerbot was looking to partner with Stratsys I was a bit non-plussed. Makerbot, as I’ve noted before, has a certain indie cred that makes this move a bit unpalatable. But, at the same time, it’s immensely important. Stratasys makes expensive, industrial-quality 3D printers.

Read original article: 

Why Makerbot Is Like Apple

No such thing as safe level of nukes

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • President Obama will seek cuts with Russia of up to one-third of nuclear weapons
  • Writers: No such thing as “acceptable” level; even lesser amount could obliterate humanity
  • Writers: 300 warheads would kill 100 million; the rest would die from starvation, poisoning
  • We cannot maintain nuclear arsenals indefinitely and still avoid a nuclear war, they say

Editor’s note: Ira Helfand is a past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility and co-president of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. Alan Robock is a distinguished professor of climate science at Rutgers University and a fellow of the American Meteorological Society, American Geophysical Union and American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is editor of the Reviews of Geophysics, a geosciences journal.

(CNN) — On Wednesday, President Obama took a meaningful step toward reshaping our nuclear arsenal in line with the reality of 21st-century security priorities. Standing at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, he announced that he would seek negotiated cuts with Russia of up to one-third of strategic nuclear weapons as well as address the issue of nuclear weapons stationed in Europe.

But we must understand that these proposed reductions are significant only if they are part of an ongoing effort to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether. If they serve to legitimize the indefinite retention of nuclear weapons at an “acceptable” level, the specter of nuclear catastrophe will continue to haunt humanity, for arsenals of this reduced size would still inflict unimaginable destruction across the planet.

A study by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PDF) showed that if only 300 warheads in the Russian arsenal got through to targets in American cities, 75 million to 100 million people would be killed in the first 30 minutes by the explosions and firestorms that would destroy all of our major metropolitan areas, and vast areas would be blanketed with radioactive fallout.

In addition, the entire economic infrastructure, on which we depend to sustain our population, would be destroyed. The transportation system, the communications network, the public health and banking systems, the food distribution network — all would be gone. In the months after this war, it is probable that the vast majority of the American population who were not killed in the initial attack would die of starvation, exposure, epidemic disease and radiation poisoning.

Ira Helfand

Ira Helfand

Alan Robock

Alan Robock

Even with Obama’s proposed reductions in nuclear weapons, the United States and Russia would each continue to possess more than triple the nuclear weapons required to cause that devastating scenario

But as unimaginable as these direct consequences would be, the effects throughout the world would be even worse.

A recent study by Robock, Oman and Stenchikov (PDF) showed that a nuclear war, even with the reduced numbers Obama has proposed, would cause catastrophic global climate disruption (PDF). The firestorms started by these nuclear explosions would loft 50 million to 100 million tons of soot into the upper atmosphere, blocking out the sun. In a matter of days, temperatures around the world would plummet by as much as 20 degrees centigrade — 36 degrees Fahrenheit — in the agricultural regions in the interior of continents. The result would be a catastrophic failure of crops throughout the world and a global famine that could claim a majority of the human population.

The existential threat to human civilization that nuclear weapons would still pose does not mean these proposed reductions are not useful. On the contrary, they are a critically important step to reduce the nuclear danger, and it is essential that we implement them as rapidly as possible.

But we can’t stop there. This effort must lead to multilateral negotiations involving all nuclear weapons states, negotiations that will produce a nuclear weapons convention banning these weapons once and for all. These negotiations will not be easy, and the treaty they produce will have to be a hard-nosed agreement that establishes mechanisms to verify and enforce compliance. But we don’t have an alternative.

Some say it is unrealistic to think we can eliminate nuclear weapons. But in truth, it is unrealistic to think we can maintain nuclear arsenals indefinitely and still avoid a nuclear conflict.

The Cuban Missile Crisis 51 years ago brought us to the brink of nuclear catastrophe. Further, we know of at least five occasions since 1979 when either Washington or Moscow prepared to launch a nuclear war in the mistaken belief that they were themselves under attack. The most recent near miss that we know about was in January 1995, a full five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. On each of these occasions we were incredibly luck and a national security strategy based on luck is not a wise course of action.

As long as there are arsenals of nuclear weapons, we are living on borrowed time. We owe it to our children to eliminate them from the world, and we should start by implementing the modest proposals made by Obama in Berlin this week.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.

Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Ira Helfand and Alan Robock.

More here - 

No such thing as safe level of nukes

Apple’s iMessage tops list of New Zealand Telecom’s most-used messaging services last month

2013 06 19 15h22 30 520x245 Apples iMessage tops list of New Zealand Telecoms most used messaging services last month

It’s hard for externals to know how popular a particular messaging service is. Yes all your friends might use it, but does the public at large? And is it larger, or smaller than other similar services?

Telecom, a well-named New Zealand provider of Internet and mobile service has lifted the curtain as to what its smartphone users are using to stay in touch. The data is brilliant, as it provides a direct window into consumer usage patters, and, the kicker, it directly compares rival services and companies.

The data, taken from Telecom mobile customers in a one month period (May, 2013):

  • 150,000 used Apple’s iMessage service
  • 140,000 used Facebook messenger
  • 78,000 used Viber
  • 35,000 used Microsoft Live Messenger
  • 32,000 used Microsoft Skype
  • 25,000 used Google Talk
  • 23,000 used WhatsApp messenger

iMessage over Facebook! Viber over Skype! Google Talk ranking so low! WhatsApp barely showing up at all! To see iMessage isn’t a surprise. Apple recently announced that users had sent 800 billion messages through the service. WhatsApp recently announced that its users send over 27 billion messages per day.

Quite obviously, mobile use demands different communication patterns than desktop computer usage; the Skype number wouldn’t be as small if all messaging usage across platforms was counted for each customer. However, in the mobile realm, it’s more than interesting that Apple has managed to top the Facebook behemoth.

The other question asked by the above data is how country specific it may be; would Viber rank as high in Spain, or California? I doubt it. Still, the data is damned interesting. Read it again. Then drop knowledge on your coworkers.

Top Image Credit: Benedict Adam

Original link:  

Apple’s iMessage tops list of New Zealand Telecom’s most-used messaging services last month

Twitter Acquires Local Discovery Startup Spindle, Will End Spindle Service

Twitter acquired Spindle, an app for local discovering, today. The Spindle team will move to San Francisco and shutter the Spindle app. “We’ve spent the past two and a half years building a product that helps you answer the question: “What’s happening nearby right now?” Every time we’ve experimented and looked beyond local discovery, we’ve been amazed by the breadth and quality of content shared on Twitter,” the company wrote in a blog post today. “By joining forces with Twitter, we can do so much more to help you find interesting, timely, and useful information about what’s happening around you.” The Spindle team also said they will be relocating from Boston to San Francisco to join the Twitter team, and will be “sunsetting the Spindle service today to focus on these new and exciting opportunities.” I reached out to Twitter for comment, who mostly pointed to Spindle’s blog post but also offered this tweet: Welcome! “@spindle: Exciting news: Spindle has been acquired by @Twitter and joins the flock

Follow this link:

Twitter Acquires Local Discovery Startup Spindle, Will End Spindle Service

Microsoft apparently reverses course on Xbox One always-on Internet connection and used game policies

Microsoft appears to have reversed its position on the always-on Internet connection and perhaps used game policies of the Xbox One in an updated post on its site today. While the post appears to address these issues a bit, there are still a few unanswered questions.

The full post is below as Microsoft’s site seems to be having some issues:

Update on June 19, 2013: As a result of feedback from the Xbox community, we have changed certain policies for Xbox One reflected in this blog. Some of this information is no longer accurate — please check here for the latest.

Q:    Does Xbox One require an “always on” Internet connection?
A:    No, it does not have to be always connected, but Xbox One does require a connection to the Internet. We’re designing Xbox One to be your all-in-one entertainment system that is connected to the cloud and always ready. We are also designing it so you can play games and watch Blu-ray movies and live TV if you lose your connection.

Q:    How do consumers benefit by being connected to the cloud?
A:    The cloud makes every experience better and more accessible.  Because Xbox One is powered by the cloud:

  • Your games have more power available to create new gameplay, persistent worlds, and deeper experiences.
  • Your system and games can update automatically, so you shouldn’t have to wait for downloads or updates.
  • Your games and entertainment are stored and saved in the cloud, so you can access them anytime, from any Xbox One.*
  • Start a game, movie, or TV show on one console and finish exactly where you left off on another.
  • You can play multiplayer games with your friends, stream movies or TV shows right away, and enjoy the community and social features of Xbox Live.
  • Xbox One can recognize you, log you in and tailor your home screen just for you.

You can discover what your friends are playing, watching and listening to if they choose to share.
These are just a few examples of how customers benefit from our platform being connected to the Internet. It brings the future of TV and games to our consumers—and it’s designed for today and the decade ahead.

* Subject to content geographical restrictions.

Q:    When will Xbox One launch and in what markets?
A:    Xbox One will launch in markets around the world later this year. We’ll have more to share later.

Q:    Can I use my current gamertag on Xbox One and will my Gamerscore and Achievements transfer?
A:    Yes. Your current Xbox Live Gamertag will stay with you on Xbox One if you choose to keep it, and your hard-earned Gamerscore and Achievements will indeed carry over from Xbox 360.

Q:    Will Xbox One be backward compatible with my existing games?
A:    Xbox One hardware is not compatible with Xbox 360 games. We designed Xbox One to play an entirely new generation of games—games that are architected to take full advantage of state-of-the-art processors and the infinite power of the cloud. We care very much about the investment you have made in Xbox 360 and will continue to support it with a pipeline of new games and new apps well into the future.

Q:    Will Xbox One allow players to trade in, purchase and play pre-owned games? 
A:    We are designing Xbox One to enable customers to trade in and resell games. We’ll have more details to share later.

Q:    Will my current Xbox Live Gold membership work with Xbox One or will I have to buy a new one?
A:    You do not need to buy a new Xbox Live Gold membership. Your current membership will work on both Xbox 360 and Xbox One.

Q:   Why require Kinect with every Xbox One?
A:    The all new Kinect is now an essential and integrated part of the platform.  By having it as a consistent part of every Xbox One, game and entertainment creators can build experiences that assume the availability of voice, gesture and natural sensing, leading to unrivaled ease of use, premium experiences and interactivity for you.

Q:    Do I need to have a specific cable or satellite TV provider to watch live TV on Xbox?
A:    Our goal is to enable live TV through Xbox One in every way that it is delivered throughout the world, whether that’s television service providers, over the air or over the Internet, or HDMI-in via a set top box (as is the case with many providers in the US). The delivery of TV is complex and we are working through the many technologies and policies around the world to make live TV available where Xbox One is available.

Q:    Xbox One is a more powerful product compared to Xbox 360, but does it also use more power?
A:   By providing multiple power states in Xbox One, we’ve balanced energy efficiency with functionality. We’ve taken a completely different approach to how Xbox One consumes power. It only uses the power it needs at that particular moment for the task at hand.

This article - 

Microsoft apparently reverses course on Xbox One always-on Internet connection and used game policies