Tag Archives: states

Kim Dotcom issues a white paper calling on US officials to investigate Megaupload prosecution by DOJ

167514485 520x245 Kim Dotcom issues a white paper calling on US officials to investigate Megaupload prosecution by DOJ

Kim Dotcom and two lawyers, Robert Amsterdam and Ira P. Rothken, have published a white paper today defending the Internet entrepreneur against a criminal prosecution issued by the United States government.

The report says the copyright case against Megaupload, the previous file sharing service run by Kim Dotcom, is based on “highly dubious legal prinicples” and that it has been manipulated by the government’s desire to appease the movie industry in exchange for political support.

“The United States government’s attack on the popular cloud storage service Megaupload and the dramatized arrest of Kim Dotcom, the company’s principal founder – together with the seizure of all their worldwide assets – represents one of the clearest examples of prosecutorial overreach in recent history,” it reads.

The defence being put forward for Megaupload

The legal team supporting Kim Dotcom argue that Megaupload was used to share a “spectrum of content” including family photographs, academic coursework and files, including videos and music, that was purchased through legal means.

It admits that some of these files including potentially infringing material, but maintains that the case against Megaupload is “grounded in a theory of criminal secondary copyright infringement.”

“In other words, the prosecution seeks to hold Megaupload and its executives criminally responsible for alleged infringement by the company’s third-party cloud storage users,” the team claims.

“The problem with the theory, however, is that secondary copyright infringement is not – nor has it ever been – a crime in the United States. The federal courts lack any power to criminalize secondary copyright infringement; the United States Congress alone has such authority, and it has not done so.”

Kim Dotcom, still facing extradition

Prosecutors based in the United States are trying to extradite Kim Dotcom from New Zealand, where he currently operates the new Mega file sharing service. Back in March, the appeals court overturned a rule that would have given Kim Dotcom and his leal team access to all of the evidence used in a prior extradition hearing, potentially giving him the documentation needed to mount a defence.

In a press release issued today, the international legal team behind Kim Dotcom said they were still challenging the extradition proceedings.

Robert Amsterdam, an international human rights lawyer representing Kim Dotcom, said he was calling on the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, as well as the Office of Professional Responsibility of the U.S. Department of Justice, to open an investigation into how the Megaupload prosecution was handled by the U.S. Department of Justice.

“In particular, the issue of special-interest influence over the executive branch and the failure of the Department of Justice to protect Megaupload consumer data access should be scrutinized,” he said.

You can take a look at the white paper in its entirety below:

 Image Credit: Phil Walter/Getty Images

View article: 

Kim Dotcom issues a white paper calling on US officials to investigate Megaupload prosecution by DOJ

Obama wraps up Latin trip with an eye back home

President Barack Obama gestures as he answers a question during a news conference with Costa Rica President Laura Chinchilla at the National Center for Art and Culture in San Jose, Costa Rica, Friday, May 3, 2013. Obama was responding to the ongoing situation in Syria. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Buy AP Photo Reprints

(AP) — President Barack Obama, concluding a three-day visit to Mexico and Costa Rica, is cheering Mexican economic advances and pressing other Central American leaders to deal with poverty and security while reaching out to a politically powerful Latino audience back home.

Boosted by reassuring jobs numbers, Obama is calling for greater trade and economic cooperation with the U.S.’s southern neighbors, arguing that economic prosperity is the best antidote to drug and gang violence and, by extension, to the illegal immigration that the U.S. is seeking to control.

In his radio and Internet address Saturday, Obama also made the case that deepening economic ties with the Americas means more jobs in the United States.

“One of the best ways to grow our economy is to sell more goods and services made in America to the rest of the world,” he said. “That includes our neighbors to the south.”

During the trip Obama has tried to modulate the exercise of U.S. influence. He has refused to insert himself in Mexico’s strategy for confronting narcotrafficking, even if it means more limited access by U.S. security officials to Mexican law enforcement. In Costa Rica, he urged Central American leaders to integrate their economies, reduce their high energy costs and confront the violence in the region.

“As governments, our job is to make sure that we’re doing everything we can to provide security and opportunity and ladders for success and prosperity for our people,” he told the regional leaders at the start of a dinner Friday. “Economic growth that creates jobs, security for people so that they can be safe in their own neighborhoods, and development that allows people to live in dignity.”

On Saturday, Obama was scheduled to speak and takes questions at a meeting at a forum in San Jose on economic growth and development.

In addition to its economic aims, the trip served as a nod by Obama to the vast Hispanic population in the United States, which heavily supported him in the 2012 election and which retains strong family and cultural ties to Latin America.

“In fact,” he said Friday in a speech aimed at young people in Mexico City, “without the strong support of Latinos, including so many Mexican Americans, I would not be standing today as president of the United States. That’s the truth.”

A theme during the trip was the U.S. effort to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws, an issue of intense interest among Latinos in the United States and in Mexico and Central America.

The vast majority of the 11 million immigrants illegally in the U.S. are from Latin America, 6 million of them from Mexico alone. Obama supports legislation that would give those immigrants a path to U.S. citizenship and he told Univision in an interview aired Friday that he would not sign a bill that did not provide such a pathway. Republicans are demanding greater border security.

“The truth is, right now, our border with Mexico is more secure than it’s been in years,” he said in his radio address. “We’ve put more boots on that border than at any time in our history, and illegal crossings are down by nearly 80 percent from their peak in 2000.”

The immigration legislation should be a compromise, he said, “which means that nobody got everything they wanted — including me.”

As Congress debates immigration legislation, Obama’s bullish — even overly rosy — depiction of Mexico’s economic prospects were meant to convince the U.S. public and lawmakers that Mexico no longer poses the illegal immigration threat it once did.

“The long-term solution to the challenge of illegal immigration is a growing and prosperous Mexico that creates more jobs and opportunities for young people here,” he said.

Mexico, Obama said, has lifted millions of people from poverty.

But while Mexico’s economy has grown, it has yet to trickle down to average workers. Huge poverty rates held steady between late 2006 and 2010, the most recent year for which government statistics are available. Between 40 and 50 percent of the population of 112 million Mexicans live in poverty, earning less than $100 a month.

Even as he tried to keep the focus on the economy and immigration, Obama did not escape the issue of drugs and violence wracking the region. In the Costa Rican capital Friday, Obama said the U.S. and Latin America share “common effects and common responsibilities” for the troubles and argued to his dining companions Friday that his country has suffered from the drug epidemic as well.

“If you go to my hometown of Chicago, and you go to some neighborhoods, they’re just as violent, if not more violent than some of the countries at this table — in part because of the pernicious influence of the drug trade,” he said.

Drug-fueled violence remains an undeniable part of daily life in many parts of the region. Costa Rica has fared better than many of its neighbors, but it worries about spillover from nearby countries. Honduras, for example, now has the highest homicide rate in the world, with about 7,200 people murdered last year in the tiny nation of 8 million people, most in drug-related crime.

Obama acknowledged the role of U.S. demand for drugs and said his administration has spent $30 billion to reduce demand in recent years. But he acknowledged that the United States remains a “big market” and that “progress is sometimes slower than we’d like it to be.”

Obama also could not avoid entanglements beyond the region. Questions about Syria dogged him and his aides during the trip. On Friday, he virtually ruled sending troops into the country torn by civil war, saying he did “not foresee a scenario” for sending U.S. soldiers into the country.

In the Republican address Saturday, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory argued that Washington should learn from Republican governors on how to make government work efficiently. He said governors need Washington to give states more flexibility, independence and accountability and called on Obama to show more leadership.

___

Online:

Obama address: www.whitehouse.gov

GOP address: www.youtube.com/gopweeklyaddress

___

Follow Jim Kuhnhenn on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkuhnhenn

Associated Press

More:

Obama wraps up Latin trip with an eye back home

DGAP-Adhoc: Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG: Francotyp-Postalia completes restructuring of Group financing ahead of schedule in the interest of future…


Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG  / Key word(s): Banking Syndicate/Agreement

19.04.2013 18:18

Dissemination of an Ad hoc announcement according to  15 WpHG, transmitted
by DGAP - a company of EquityStory AG.
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ad hoc notification in accordance with section 15 of the German Securities
Trading Act (WpHG)
19 April 2013
Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG
Triftweg 21 - 26
16547 Birkenwerder (Germany)
ISIN: DE000FPH9000
WKN: FPH900
Frankfurt Stock Exchange, Regulated Market (Prime Standard)

Francotyp-Postalia completes restructuring of Group financing ahead of
schedule in the interest of future growth

Birkenwerder, 19 April 2013. The Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG (ISIN
DE000FPH9000), Birkenwerder, has placed Group financing on a secure footing
for the next 3.5 years with a renewal option for another 1.5 years.
Financing contracts were signed today with a consortium of banks led by
Deutsche Postbank AG as Mandated Lead Arranger and Agent and with
Commerzbank AG as Mandated Lead Arranger and Collateral Security Agent.
This means that liabilities in connection with the original financing
originally agreed until the end of February 2014 in an amount of roughly
EUR 36 million will be redeemed ahead of schedule.

The total volume of the new syndicated loan comprises EUR 45 million. From
the point of view of the Francotyp-Postalia, the loan offers partly better
conditions than the previous credit commitment and reflects the
requirements of the operating companies, while allowing greater
flexibility.

In the context of the Group's financing the banks have rewarded the
improved balance sheet structure and the positive development of the FP
Group. The broadened financial framework conditions will enable the company
to consistently push ahead with its projects and to secure its planned
future growth especially in the United States and Germany.

The Management Board

Contact:

Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG
Investor Relations
Triftweg 21 - 26
16547 Birkenwerder
Tel.: +49-3303-525-410
Fax: +49-3303-53707-410
E-mail: s.prueser@francotyp.com

This notification does not constitute either a sale offer or a request to
buy securities of Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG. The shares offered as part
of the IPO have already been sold.

This notification must not be published, distributed or transmitted in any
other way in the United States of America. This notification does not
constitute an offer to purchase or sell securities of Francotyp-Postalia
Holding AG in the United States of America and does not aim to make
offerings of this type. The securities described in this notification are
not and will not be registered in accordance with the United States
Securities Act of 1933 in its currently prevailing version (the 'Securities
Act') and may only be offered for purchase or sale within the United States
of America without being previously registered if subject to an exemption
in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Act.

In the United Kingdom, this notification is only directed at persons and/or
is only intended for distribution to persons who (i) have sector experience
with investments in the context of Article 19 (5) of the U.K. Financial
Services and Markets Acts 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the
'Regulation') or (ii) who are covered by Article 49 (2) (a) to (d) of the
Regulation ('high net worth entities') (all such persons will be
hereinafter be referred to as 'qualified persons'). The notification is
only directed at qualified persons. Non-qualified persons should not
operate based on this notification or its contents or rely upon them. Every
investment or investing activity to which this notification refers is
available to qualified persons only and is processed solely by qualified
persons.

The information contained in this notification is not intended for
transmission to or within the United States of America.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Language:     English
Company:      Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG
              Triftweg 21-26
              16547 Birkenwerder
              Germany
Phone:        +49 (0)3303 525 777
Fax:          +49 (0)3303 53 70 77 77
E-mail:    ir@francotyp.com
Internet:  www.francotyp.com
ISIN:         DE000FPH9000
WKN:          FPH900
Listed:       Regulierter Markt in Frankfurt (Prime Standard); Freiverkehr
              in Berlin, Dsseldorf, Mnchen, Stuttgart

End of Announcement                             DGAP News-Service

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Follow this link: 

DGAP-Adhoc: Francotyp-Postalia Holding AG: Francotyp-Postalia completes restructuring of Group financing ahead of schedule in the interest of future…

EANS-News: Atrium European Real Estate Limited successfully places a EUR350 million unsecured Eurobond


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Corporate news transmitted by euro adhoc. The issuer/originator is solely
  responsible for the content of this announcement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capital measures

St Helier Jersey / Channel Islands (euro adhoc) - ** NOT FOR RELEASE OR
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION IN WHOLE OR IN PART IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES,
AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN OR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ** 

Atrium European Real Estate Limited
("Atrium" or the "Group")

ATRIUM SUCCESSFULLY PLACES A EUR350MILLION UNSECURED EUROBOND

-Atrium's first unsecured bond is 3.7 times oversubscribed-

Jersey, 19 April 2013. Atrium European Real Estate Limited (VSE/Euronext:ATRS),
a leading owner, operator and developer of retail real estate and shopping
centres in Central and Eastern Europe, announces that it has successfully
completed the placement of a EUR350million unsecured seven year eurobond (the
"Bond"), maturing in April 2020 bearing a fixed coupon of 4.00% per annum. The
issue price was 99.569%. 

The order book for the issue was over EUR1.3billion, representing an
oversubscription of some 3.7 times. The Bond has been placed with a broad range
of institutional debt investors across Europe and confirms the confidence of
investors in Atrium's credit profile. 

Both Standard & Poors and Fitch have assigned a BBB- investment grade credit
rating to the Bond, in line with Atrium's own corporate rating. 

The proceeds of the issue will strengthen Atrium's liquidity and will be used
for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, as and when identified,
as well as the refinancing of its existing secured debt.

Commenting on the transaction, Rachel Lavine, Atrium's chief executive, said: 
"The success of this issue, which has been heavily oversubscribed, is a real
endorsement of the progress we have made at Atrium and provides us with
substantial financial liquidity to support the Group's growth strategy. It both
builds on the progress we have made, which led to achieving our investment grade
ratings at the end of last year, and enables us to take advantage of the current
low interest rate environment, and the highly active debt capital markets.  I am
very pleased with the result."


Analysts:             Ljudmila Popova 
                   lpopova@aere.com

Press & Shareholders: FTI Consulting Inc        
                      +44 (0)20 7831 3113
                      Richard Sunderland/ Will Henderson/ Daniel O'Donnell
                   atrium@fticonsulting.com

        
Atrium is established as a closed-end investment company domiciled in Jersey.
Atrium is registered with the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets as a
collective investment scheme which may offer participations in The Netherlands
pursuant to article 2:66 of the Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel
toezicht). All investments are subject to risk. Past performance is no guarantee
of future returns. The value of investments may fluctuate. Results achieved in
the past are no guarantee of future results.


The information contained herein does not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the securities
referred to herein in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale
would be unlawful prior to registration, exemption from registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any jurisdiction.
Any offer of securities to the public that may be deemed to be made pursuant to
this communication in any EEA Member State that has implemented EU Directive
2003/71/EC (together with any amendments and applicable implementing measures in
any Member State, the "Prospectus Directive") is addressed solely to qualified
investors (within the meaning of the Prospectus Directive) in that Member State.
This document is an advertisement and not a prospectus for the purposes of
applicable measures implementing EU Directive 2003/71/EC (such Directive,
together with any amendments and applicable implementing measures in the
relevant home Member State under such Directive, the "Prospectus Directive") and
as such does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to
purchase securities. A prospectus prepared pursuant to the Prospectus Directive
has been published, which can be obtained from the website of the Luxembourg
stock exchange. Investors should not subscribe for or purchase any securities
referred to in this document except on the basis of the information in the
prospectus.
This communication is addressed only to and directed only at (i) persons who are
outside the United Kingdom or (ii) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial
Promotion) Order 2005 (the "Order") and (iii) high net worth entities, and other
persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a)
to (d) of the Order (all such persons in (i), (ii) and (iii) above together
being referred to as "relevant persons"). Any investment activity to which this
communication relates will only be available to and will only be engaged with,
relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely
on this document or any of its contents. 
This communication is not for public release, publication or distribution,
directly or indirectly, in or into the United States (including its territories
and possessions, any State of the United States and the District of Columbia).
This communication is not and does not constitute or form a part of any offer
of, or solicitation to purchase or subscribe for, any securities in the United
States. Any such securities have not been, and will not be, registered under the
United States Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"). Any such securities
may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or
benefit of, U.S. persons (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the
Securities Act), except pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. No public offering of securities will be
made in the United States of America.
Certain statements in this document are not historical facts and are "forward
looking". Forward-looking statements include statements concerning Atrium's
plans, expectations, projections, objectives, targets, goals, strategies, future
events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs,
plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, Atrium's competitive strengths and
weaknesses, plans or goals relating to forecasted performance, financial
position and future operations and development, its business strategy and the
trends it anticipates in the industries and the political and legal environment
in which it operates and other information that is not historical information.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that the predictions,
forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be
achieved. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Atrium does not intend and
does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement contained
herein.


Further inquiry note:
For further information:
FTI Consulting Inc.:
+44 (0)20 7831 3113
Richard Sunderland
Will Henderson
Richard.sunderland@fticonsulting.com

end of announcement                               euro adhoc 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


company:     Atrium European Real Estate Limited
             Seaton Place 11-15
             UK-JE4 0QH  St Helier Jersey / Channel Islands 
phone:       +44 (0)20 7831 3113
mail:     richard.sunderland@fticonsulting.com
WWW:      http://www.aere.com
sector:      Real Estate
ISIN:        JE00B3DCF752
indexes:     Standard Market Continuous
stockmarkets: official market: Wien 
language:   English
 

 

 

This article: 

EANS-News: Atrium European Real Estate Limited successfully places a EUR350
million unsecured Eurobond

124,000 H-1B Visa Applications in 5 Days for a mere 85,000 slots

2013 04 08 15h10 55 520x245 124,000 H 1B visa applications filed in 5 days for the mere 85,000 open slots

Get ready to grimace: It wasn’t too surprising news that the H-1B visa cap was met in the first five days of open applications; interesting however was how far over the 85,000 ceiling applications managed to streak: all the way to 124,000, or 39,000 over the limit.

As ComputerWorld’s Patrick Thibodeau reported at the time, the United States government “treats the first five days as one day.” If the total available supply is lower than demand in that period, a lottery is held. The lottery itself took place yesterday.

The new visas go into effect October 14th.

H-1B visas are used by American companies to hire foreign talent to work in the country. They are often associated with high-technology companies looking to recruit the best and brightest from abroad to work in their campuses across the United States, in such places as Silicon Valley.

As TNW reported at the end of the maxed out application period, there is a political appetite to change the situation, but little forward movement. Proposals to move the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) immigration system – by which skilled folks outside can get inside – forward as a single issue are stuck. The idea on Capitol Hill now is to move forward a larger, unified immigration package.

High-skilled immigration reform could be muddled, or weakened in the process. Given the above situation, it’s quite obvious that something needs to be done.

To that end, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is marshaling the technology troops. However, even that group has hit turbulence.

Top Image Credit: Zoe Rudisill

Continued:  

124,000 H-1B Visa Applications in 5 Days for a mere 85,000 slots

U.S., Japan agree on plan to hand back Okinawa base

TOKYO (Reuters) – The United States and Japan announced on Friday an agreement for the return to Japan of a U.S. air base, taking a step to resolving an issue that has vexed ties when both countries face a belligerent North Korea and a rising China.

Link to article:

U.S., Japan agree on plan to hand back Okinawa base

Lance Armstrong swim contest sunk

Oprah Winfrey speaks with Lance Armstrong during an interview on the controversy surrounding his cycling career on Monday, January 14, in Austin, Texas. Oprah Winfrey's exclusive no-holds-barred interview with Lance Armstrong, Oprah Winfrey speaks with Lance Armstrong during an interview on the controversy surrounding his cycling career on Monday, January 14, in Austin, Texas. Oprah Winfrey’s exclusive no-holds-barred interview with Lance Armstrong, “Oprah and Lance Armstrong: The Worldwide Exclusive,” has expanded to air as a two-night event on OWN: Oprah Winfrey Network. The interview airs Thursday, January 17, and Friday, January 18.

HIDE CAPTION

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

Lance Armstrong over the years

<<

<

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

>

>>

(CNN) — Even at the age of 41 Lance Armstrong‘s thirst for competition remains undimmed.

But the disgraced doper’s quest to take part in a swimming event in Texas has been sunk before he’s even hit the water.

Armstrong was banned from cycling for life by the United States Anti-Doping Agency after they accused him of running the “most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program” the sport had ever seen.

He refused to cooperate with USADA’s investigation and was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles, later admitting taking performance enhancing drugs in an interview with Oprah Winfrey.

Read: Justice Department joins Armstrong suit

Armstrong had hoped to compete at the Masters South Central Zone Swimming Championships in his home town of Austin this weekend, thinking it was not subject to USA or World Anti-Doping Agency codes.

But after news of his entry in the 500, 1,000 and 1,650-yard freestyle events, swimming’s governing body FINA stepped in to object to his participation.

Lance Armstrong’s demise: How an all-American hero fell to earth

Now Armstrong’s camp say he won’t take to the pool.

Rob Butcher, executive director of U.S. Masters Swimming, who are staging the event, told CNN: “The word back is that he is not eligible to participate in our competition because FINA follows the WADA code — the World Anti-Doping Authority code.

“And, as such, we are bound — through a couple layers of separation down — to our events as well.

“So the takeaway is: while he has entered and you’ll see him on a heat sheet, he is not eligible to participate in that event. Or any other U.S.M.S competition.”

Two Lance Armstrong moves in the works

Butcher said upon informing Armstrong’s camp on Thursday morning, he will now withdraw from the event.

Butcher added: “After giving them this news, his people, not talking to him directly but his management team, said, ‘You know what: we don’t want to cause harm to your organization. We’re not trying to create a sideshow circus for you guys. He’s just going to withdraw or not show up for the event.’”

In a statement issued Thursday, U.S. Masters Swimming clarified its stance on the matter further.

“Lance Armstrong is not eligible to race in U.S. Masters Swimming competitions,” it read.

“The former competitive cyclist has been a member of U.S. Masters Swimming for several years. The spirit and purpose of USMS is to encourage adults to swim.

“USMS is affiliated with FINA (Federation Internationale de Natacion) through United States Aquatic Sports.

“When we became aware that Mr. Armstrong entered the 2013 South Central Zone Championship in Austin, Texas, April 5-7, a local event sanctioned by USMS, we contacted United States Aquatic Sports and FINA to clarify our responsibilities in this case. The event in question is conducted in a 25-yard pool, a non-Olympic course not contested on the international stage.

“After discussion with United States Aquatic Sports and FINA, it was agreed that although Mr. Armstrong is eligible for membership in U.S. Masters Swimming, he is not currently eligible to compete in sanctioned swimming competitions, regardless of the type of course.

“The World Anti-Doping Agency has banned Mr. Armstrong from competition. FINA accepts the WADA Code and USMS, as a member of United States Aquatic Sports, recognizes and respects adjudications under the Code.”

Armstrong had posted on his Twitter account last month that he was in swimming training but he will now have to wait to make his competitive debut in the pool.

A statement posted on FINA’s website confirmed the competition was under the jurisdiction of U.S Masters Swimming and quoted FINA rule DC 15.1.

It reads: “The Testing, therapeutic use exemptions and hearing results or other final adjudications of any Signatory to the Code which are consistent with the Code and are within the Signatory’s authority, shall be recognized and respected by FINA and its Member Federations.”

As a result they added: “FINA wrote a letter to the U.S. Masters Swimming (with copy to US Aquatic Sports and USA Swimming) requesting not to accept the entry of Mr. Lance Armstrong in the above mentioned competition.”

Feds join whistle-blower lawsuit against Lance Armstrong

CNN’s Shannon Travis contributed to this story

Source article: 

Lance Armstrong swim contest sunk

Who’s next to legalize same-sex marriage?

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Eleven countries have legalized same-sex marriage; the Netherlands was first in 2001
  • Several countries have pending legislation and may join that group soon
  • France, New Zealand, Uruguay are among the leading candidates

(CNN) — It’s not just the United States grappling with the issue of same-sex marriage.

Many countries around the world are re-examining their laws, and some appear to be on the brink of changing them.

Senators in Uruguay approved a marriage equality bill Tuesday that puts them on course to be the 12th country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage.

And this week, senators in France will begin weighing a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage and allow same-sex couples to adopt children. The bill, which has the support of President Francois Hollande, has cleared the lower house of Parliament.

It “would be a major advance for our country in terms of equality of rights,” said the French gay, lesbian and transgender rights group Inter-LGBT. “The law must allow all couples to unite themselves as they wish and must protect all families, without discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity.”

But like the United States, France is far from united on the issue. In January, hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets of Paris to protest same-sex marriage. Most of France is Catholic, and the Roman Catholic Church strongly opposes the bill, along with social conservatives and other religious groups.

“I do not personally agree with gay marriage, as I am a Christian and believe what the Bible says about marriage being between one woman and one man for a lifetime,” said CNN iReporter Oluwasegun Olowu-Davies, who shot video of the Paris march on his phone. “If your lifestyle doesn’t allow you to conceive, there is a reason.”

Across the English Channel, the United Kingdom is also considering legalization. In February, lawmakers in the House of Commons approved the second reading of a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage in England and Wales. (Scotland has its own legalization bill in the works, while Northern Ireland rejected a similar measure in October.)

More debate and more votes are still necessary before the bill can become law, but the wide margin of February’s vote — 400-175 — suggests that it may have the support it needs to eventually pass. Prime Minister David Cameron is also in favor of the bill, despite opposition within his own party.

“I am a great supporter of marriage,” Cameron said in the House of Commons. “I want to promote marriage, defend marriage, encourage marriage.

“The great thing about (February’s) vote is that two gay people who love each other will now be able to get married, and I think that is an important advance. I think we should be promoting marriage rather than looking at any other way of weakening it.”

A former British colony, New Zealand, could legalize same-sex marriage this month. After a marriage equality bill passed two readings in Parliament — the latest in March by a 77-44 margin — the third and final vote is widely expected to be a formality.

The public, however, might be more split than its lawmakers. According to a survey conducted last month by the country’s largest newspaper, the New Zealand Herald, opposition to same-sex marriage has increased to 48%. That sentiment is more in line with nearby Australia, where lawmakers overwhelmingly voted against a legalization bill in September.

In Uruguay, the bill approved Tuesday by a 23-8 margin now goes back to lawmakers in the lower house of parliament. That house approved a different version of the bill in December.

Same-sex marriage rights worldwide

Legalized nationwide:
Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden

Legalized in certain regions:
Brazil, Mexico, United States

Civil unions or domestic partnerships:
Andorra, Austria, Brazil, Colombia, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greenland, Hungary, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Slovenia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Uruguay and parts of Australia, Mexico, United States and Venezuela

In 2009, Uruguay became the first Latin American country to allow same-sex couples to adopt children. It was also one of the first Latin American countries to allow civil unions. Same-sex marriage is backed by President Jose Mujica and, according to one poll, the majority of the public.

But Argentina is the only country in Latin America that has legalized same-sex marriage, doing so in 2010. Brazil and Mexico, like the United States, have same-sex marriages only in certain states.

Of the 11 countries where same-sex marriage is legal, eight are in Europe. The Netherlands was the first, in 2001, and it was later joined by Belgium, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Portugal and Denmark. Argentina, Canada and South Africa are the three non-European countries in the group.

There are no Asian countries where same-sex marriage is legal, but perhaps that might soon change.

Last year, a same-sex Buddhist couple married in Taiwan, where a legalization bill has been pending since 2003. Taipei is also home to Asia’s largest annual gay pride parade, according to organizers.

The Supreme Court of Nepal ruled in favor of legalization in 2008, but those rights haven’t been put into effect because the country’s new constitution has been stuck in limbo for years.

In July, the Justice Ministry in Vietnam said it would consider a provision for same-sex marriage rights in an amendment to the country’s marriage laws.

“It’s time for us to look at the reality,” Minister Ha Hung Cuong said in an online debate at the time. “The number of homosexuals has mounted to hundreds of thousands. It’s not a small figure. … They may own property. We, of course, have to handle these issues legally.”

CNN’s Alexis Lai, Catherine E. Shoichet, Laura Smith-Spark and Saskya Vandoorne contributed to this report.

Visit site:  

Who’s next to legalize same-sex marriage?

Should U.S. roll back Korea rhetoric?

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • NEW: U.S. may have contributed to amping up tensions, official says
  • NEW: North Korea may be planning another missile launch, U.S. official says
  • North Korea makes more threats of possible war
  • North Korea lacks missile technology to reach the U.S. mainland

Washington (CNN) — Recent announcements of U.S. military deployments in response to belligerent statements by North Korea may have contributed to the escalating tensions between the countries, Pentagon officials told CNN on Thursday in explaining an effort to reduce U.S. rhetoric about North Korea.

“We accused the North Koreans of amping things up, now we are worried we did the same thing,” one Defense Department official said.

The officials spoke on the same day a U.S. official told CNN that communications intercepts indicated North Korea may be planning to launch a mobile ballistic missile in coming days or weeks.

South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin told a parliamentary committee in Seoul that the North has moved a medium-range missile to its east coast for an imminent test firing or military drill, according to the semi-official South Korean news agency Yonhap.

Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Program at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, said he thinks the missile in question is a Musudan, which the North hasn’t tested before.

The missile is based on a Soviet system with a range of about 2,400 kilometers (1,500 miles), far enough to reach Japan but not U.S. forces based on Guam. He called the missile movement “of concern, certainly to the U.S. military and to Japan.”

As a vital ally to South Korea since the Korean war in the 1950s, the United States has pledged military backing to Seoul in the event of an attack by North Korea. In addition, North Korea has been developing nuclear weapon technology, raising concerns of rapid proliferation in the region and even a possible nuclear strike by Pyongyang.

The fraught situation on the Korean Peninsula stems from the North’s latest long-range rocket launch in December and underground nuclear test in February.

In response, the United States helped bring tougher U.N. sanctions on North Korea and took part in joint military exercises with South Korea, prompting Kim Jong Un’s government to ratchet up its threats in recent weeks.

That caused the United States to display its military strength in the annual drills taking place now, flying B-2 stealth bombers capable of carrying conventional or nuclear weapons, as well as Cold War-era B-52s and F-22 Raptor stealth fighters over South Korea.

On Thursday, a North Korean army official warned that “the moment of explosion is approaching fast.”

“No one can say a war will break out in Korea or not and whether it will break out today or tomorrow,” said the spokesman for the General Staff of the North’s Korean People’s Army (KPA).

“The responsibility for this grave situation entirely rests with the U.S. administration and military warmongers keen to encroach upon the DPRK’s sovereignty and bring down its dignified social system with brigandish logic,” the KPA spokesman added in a statement published by the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

On Wednesday, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters that “the provocative actions and bellicose rhetoric that we see from North Korea is obviously of concern, and we are taking the necessary precautionary measures, many of which have been reported on.”

“It is also the case that the behavior of the regime in Pyongyang that we are seeing now represents a familiar pattern,” he added in reference to past episodes of heightened North Korean threats and rhetoric generally considered efforts to increase leverage on international issues.

A Defense Department official told CNN on Thursday that from a communications point of view, “we are trying to turn the volume down” on U.S. rhetoric about North Korea. The official, speaking on condition of not being identified, said the change referred to public statements by the Obama administration instead of how U.S. military hardware were being deployed in the region.

According to the official, some Pentagon officials were surprised at how U.S. news releases and statements on North Korea were generating world headlines and therefore provoking a Pyongyang response.

“We are absolutely trying to ratchet back the rhetoric,” the official said. “We become part of the cycle. We allowed that to happen.”

Previously, the Obama administration established a “playbook” of prescripted actions and responses to the last several weeks of North Korean rhetoric and provocations, an administration official said Thursday.

The scripted actions included an increased show of U.S. military force — such as the flying of B-2 bombers — during the annual U.S.-South Korea military exercise, the Foal Eagle.

“Eyebrows started to go up when it was clear Foal Eagle was going to be protected from the budget cuts of sequestration,” the official said, referring to the forced federal spending cuts that went into effect in March.

The playbook planning began under former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta but was picked up and supported strongly by now-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the official said.

Details of the playbook were first reported by the Wall Street Journal. The administration official declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the situation.

Some moves not scripted

However, some of the U.S. military’s reactions to Pyongyang’s saber-rattling were not part of the playbook planning.

Instead, they arose from concerns about what North Korea has planned as the U.S.-South Korean exercise conclude, the administration official said.

For example, the deployment of ballistic missile defenses closer to North Korea and a land-based missile-intercept system to Guam were ordered in recent days when U.S. intelligence began to gather information that North Korea might be planning additional missile launches.

A ‘complicated, combustible situation’

U.S. officials have publicly stressed that the American military moves were meant as much to assure the South Koreans that they have Washington’s full support.

“What I can tell you is that our response and the mix of assets we have applied to our responses is prudent, logical and measured,” Pentagon spokesman George Little said earlier this week.

“We are in the midst right now of — of very important annual exercises that we regularly conduct with the South Koreans, and these exercises are about alliance assurance. They’re first and foremost about showing the South Koreans and showing our other allies in the region, including the Japanese, that we are ready to defend them in the wake of threats.”

When asked by CNN earlier this week about the “message” the United States was trying to send to North Korea, Little said it was the North Koreans who are being provocative.

“The North Koreans — even before those exercises started — had undertaken provocative steps, and they’ve conducted underground nuclear tests, they’ve conducted missile tests outside their international obligations. So they have a track record now over the past few months of provocative behavior,” he said.

“We are in the business of ensuring our South Korean allies that we will help defend them in the face of threats,” Little said in response. “So I don’t think it’s a contradiction. I think that North Koreans have engaged in certain actions and have said things that are provocative. We are looking for the temperature to be taken down on the Korean Peninsula.”

Hagel hinted at risks in reacting to North Korea, calling the tensions a “complicated, combustible situation” that could “explode into a worse situation.”

“It only takes being wrong once. And I don’t want to be the secretary of defense who was wrong once. So we will continue to take these threats seriously. I hope the North will ratchet this very dangerous rhetoric down,” Hagel said Wednesday.

“But they’ve got to be a responsible member of the world community. And you don’t achieve that responsibility and peace and prosperity by making nuclear threats and taking very provocative actions.”

CNN’s Chris Lawrence, Joe Sterling and Tom Cohen contributed to this report

More - 

Should U.S. roll back Korea rhetoric?

Western envoys to attend ICC-indictee Kenyatta’s inauguration

NAIROBI (Reuters) – The United States and several other European nations are expecting to send ambassadors to attend the swearing in next week of Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenya’s president-elect who is indicted for crimes against humanity at The Hague.

More here: 

Western envoys to attend ICC-indictee Kenyatta’s inauguration